DGR — Decision‑Grade Reasoning (Governance Protocol)
Purpose: produce an auditable, machine‑validated decision record for review and storage.
Slug: dgr · Version: 1.0.4 · Modes: dgr_min / dgr_full / dgr_strict · Output: schema-valid JSON
What this skill does
DGR is a reasoning governance protocol that produces a machine‑validated, auditable artifact describing:
the decision context,
explicit assumptions and risks,
a recommendation with rationale,
and a consistency check.
This skill is designed for high‑stakes or review‑required decisions where you want traceability and structured review.
How to use
Ask your question — Provide a decision request or problem context
Pick mode:
dgr_min|dgr_full|dgr_strictStore JSON artifact in ticket / incident / audit log
What this skill is NOT (non‑claims)
This skill does NOT guarantee:
correctness, optimality, or truth,
elimination of hallucinations,
legal/medical/financial advice suitability,
or regulatory compliance by itself.
DGR improves process quality (clarity, traceability, reviewability) — not outcome certainty.
When to use
Use when you need:
an auditable record of reasoning,
explicit assumptions/risks surfaced,
reviewer‑friendly structure,
a consistent output format across tasks and models.
Inputs
A user request/question (free text).
Optional: context identifiers (ticket ID, policy name), and desired mode:
dgr_min,dgr_full, ordgr_strict.
Mode Behavior
| Mode | Speed | Detail Level | Clarifications | Review Required | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dgr_min |
Fastest | Minimal compliant output | Only critical gaps | Risk-based | Quick decisions, low stakes |
dgr_full |
Moderate | Fuller decomposition + alternatives | More proactive | Balanced | Standard decision support |
dgr_strict |
Slower | Conservative analysis | More questioning | Default on ambiguity | High-stakes, uncertain contexts |
Outputs
A single JSON artifact matching schema.json.
Minimum acceptance criteria (see schema.json):
at least 1 assumption
at least 1 risk
recommendationpresentconsistency_checkpresent
Safety / governance boundaries
Always ask for clarification if key decision inputs are missing.
If the decision is high‑risk, escalate via
recommendation.review_required = true.If uncertainty is high, explicitly state uncertainty and limit scope.
Do not fabricate sources or cite documents you did not see.
Files in this skill
prompt.md— operational instructionsschema.json— output schema (stub aligned to DGR spec)examples/*.md— example inputs and outputsfield_guide.md— how to interpret DGR artifact fields
Quick start
1) Provide a decision request.
2) Choose a mode (dgr_min default).
3) The skill returns a JSON artifact suitable for review and storage.
Changelog
1.0.4 — Remove redundant CLAWHUB_SUMMARY.md; summary now sourced from SKILL.md front-matter.
1.0.3 — Tighten front-matter description for better conversion, add reasoning category, compress identity block for faster scanning.
1.0.2 — Add ClawHub front-matter metadata with emoji and homepage for improved discovery and presentation.
1.0.0 — Initial public release of DGR skill bundle with auditable decision reasoning framework, governance protocols, and structured output format.
Note: This is an opt‑in reasoning mode. It is meant to be used alongside human decision‑making, not as a replacement.